Reps. Schultz and Windschitl Hate Gay Students Because They Hate Gay Marriage

25 Responses to “Reps. Schultz and Windschitl Hate Gay Students Because They Hate Gay Marriage”

  • migxp1:

    gay marriage is all …
    gay marriage is all about legalization of human sexual practices or human sexual behavior, thats it

  • evilsoxkitty:

    @lukewarmstormed
    1) …

    @lukewarmstormed
    1) Yeah, making this legislation to repeal selective parts of “extra” legislation that much more pointless and corrupt.
    2) Calling somebody stupid doesn’t make you right. YOU should be embarassed to buy into the trendy veiled(or not) accusations of supporting bastardized “Communism.”
    3) Yeah, and even with laws, we also have rape, murder, larceny, assault, etc. Imagine how bad bullying would be if there weren’t laws requiring that the most popular forms be taken seriously.

  • lukewarmstormed:

    @evilsoxkitty
    1. …

    @evilsoxkitty
    1. Laws against abuse are in effect rendering more legislation useless and probably corrupt.

    2. Red scare? That’s just a stupid comment you should be embarrassed

    3. Schools even with legislation have bulling so these laws obviously do nothing. The source of the problem of course is how children are raised and since the children are raised by the state, an entity that requires bullying to survive, emulate the behavior.

  • evilsoxkitty:

    @lukewarmstormed …
    @lukewarmstormed And I ran out of room before I could say the important part – My comment was immediately removed for a reason, which as I mention in the last message, it was likely full of mistakes. You look like a freaking moron when you argue with somebody who retracted their statements before anybody got a chance to read them(other than you, of course, because it was emailed to you as a reply to your comment).

  • evilsoxkitty:

    @lukewarmstormed I …
    @lukewarmstormed I forget which comment this is, because I was tired last night and posted a lot of mistakes that were immediately removed, so I’ll just say this… First of all, we’re not talking about discrimination, we’re talking about hrassment and bullying, which is intentionally causing psychological and/or physical harm. We’re also not talking about businesses. We’re talking about schools, all of which are regulated by the state. BTW, the 50′s called, they want their Red Scare back.

  • lukewarmstormed:

    @evilsoxkitty
    And …

    @evilsoxkitty
    And my point is that businesses should be allowed to discriminate based on any criteria. You do know that’s the whole idea behind private property or do you believe everything belongs to the state comrade?

  • Levetti408:

    I thought his name …
    I thought his name was pronounced wind-shit-l. oops.

  • biohazard93808:

    It’s not making …
    It’s not making marriage “undefined” it’s just allowing same sex couples. Guess what by the time you read this statement one same sex couple has gotten married somewhere on the planet. Did them getting married make you gay? No. A pedophile? No.
    Two consenting adults = pedophiles? No.
    Two consenting adults = 3 consenting adults? No.
    Anything else to say, message me.

  • biohazard93808:

    Two consenting …
    Two consenting adults = pedophiles?
    Two consenting adults = 3 consenting adults?
    (2 does not equal 3 right?)
    Two consenting adults are just that, two-consenting-adults. There is a difference between children and adults don’t you agree. And anyways most pedophiles are straight men.

  • tetsubo57:

    @evilleclarks I am …
    @evilleclarks I am not attempting to use the law to restrict the rights of others. To put students in danger just to make a political point. Cite the Bible until you are blue in the face for all I care,. But don’t attempt to enforce your faith onto anyone else. Especially by using secular law. I have no hate towards you are your faith. Only towards an attempt to use your faith to harm others. I couldn’t be more serious.

  • evilleclarks:

    @tetsubo57 Are you …
    @tetsubo57 Are you serious?! You say “there are any number of things in life” that bug you. But “if they don’t involve me personally, what business is it of mine”? Indeed – what business is it of yours if someone cites their Bible. Keep your hate to yourself, as well as your insults.

  • spyder234567:

    To be honest we …
    To be honest we have NO rights anymore, thanx to our government.

  • tetsubo57:

    How do you know …
    How do you know what my lifestyle is? Are you psychic? Because I didn’t mention my lifestyle in the above passages.

    As I have said above, you have no Constitutional right to not be offended. There are any number of things in life that bug me. But if they don’t involve me personally, what business is it of mine if someone else enjoys them? What consenting adults do isn’t my, or your, business. marital equality for all Americans.

  • evilleclarks:

    @tetsubo57 We are …
    @tetsubo57 We are IN a moral panic – but admittedly, only among those who seem to have morals beyond the “do what feels good” mentality. I wonder if you’ve considered that I find your lifestyle as offensive as that of a pedophile. Tell me, who are YOU to dictate what lifestyle is acceptable, and what is offensive?

  • tetsubo57:

    Well, since I am …
    Well, since I am discussing consenting adults I’m not concerned with polyamorous people. And the trend in the US has been to *raise* not lower the age of consent. But nice try at a moral panic. I also find it offensive that you seem to imply a connection between gay people and pedophiles. Marital equality for all Americans. Don’t be so close minded that you can not think.

  • evilleclarks:

    Well here’s one, …
    Well here’s one, tetsubo57. Once marriage is left undefined, anybody aught to have the same rights including polygamists and pedophiles. How hard will you fight to keep child molesters from lowering the age of consent to 13? Child is a huge industry, don’t fool yourself into thinking they wouldn’t like to have their activity legalized.

    “Don’t be so open-minded that your brains fall out”

  • evilleclarks:

    It’s like nailing …
    It’s like nailing jelly to a wall.

    Do something, ZJ, about the hateful comments against Christians. About the proposed violence against “straight kids”. Just a little comment about how it’s wrong to be hateful to someone who disagrees with you. You might consider posting the same rebuttal against Dwaithy that you used on
    STR8TPAGANIST.

    That’s all I’m asking. It’s not that hard. Can someone help me here?

  • tetsubo57:

    Well apparently …
    Well apparently these two douche nozzles put forth this bill because they are small-minded, petty bigots. I have yet to hear an argument against marital equality that didn’t boil down to one of two reasons: MY holy book said so OR it is icky. Sorry asshats, you have no Constitutional right to not be offended.

  • ZJemptv:

    Unless I or someone …
    Unless I or someone I endorse is actually working to legally make life more dangerous for heterosexuals (by the withholding of certain protections, etc.), I don’t see what grounds you have to say I “hold a double standard and are no more credible than any other hate monger”.

  • MxTori:

    Yes we are My …
    Yes we are My original comment was just a sarcastic joke. I’d never advocate violence, under any circumstance.

  • MxTori:

    Thank you.
    Thank you.

  • evilleclarks:

    I like your quote, …
    I like your quote, by the way.

  • evilleclarks:

    On that point, we …
    On that point, we are in accord. Violence and hate are counter productive. I suspect we agree on a great many things, but homosexual lifestyles is not among them.

  • MxTori:

    :-| This quote …
    :-| This quote comes to mind.

    “The right to swing my fist ends where the other man’s nose begins.”

    You have the right to be sarcastic, but you don’t have the right to beat the out of some one.

  • evilleclarks:

    @MxTori They don’t …
    @MxTori They don’t hate you MxTori, they’re just being sarcastic.

Leave a Reply

Security Code: